Monthly Archives: November 2011


Addressing Organizational Conflict

Our Peer Mediation Programs

All too often organizations cry out for what I call the quick fix. You know the scenario: two employees not getting along, probably personality differences, not real receptive to previous internal interventions, etc., so the organization decides to bring in outside help to fix the problem. Sound familiar?

I 00004000 call it the quick fix because the conflict between the two employees may also be a symptom of a much larger organizational problem, or, as I like to call it, a system malfunction. In this scenario, a system malfunction can be a direct result of poor leadership, dysfunctional work groups, inadequate performance management processes and/or a general lack of soft skills training and resources for employees on the part of the organization.

Now do not get me wrong. It is very important to address the actual conflicts between employees and to help them reach acceptable resolutions, etc. However, it would be a mistake for an organization to limit the scope of a conflict resolution to the immediate conflicting employees without also being willing to look at the surrounding system where the conflict resides in. Without a more thorough assessment, an organization can easily get into the habit of treating the symptom while ignoring the problem.

In order to assess if there are organizational factors that are contributing to the conflict(s), consider investigating the following checkpoints:

Checkpoint 1: Is adequate leadership within the organization and department being demonstrated?

The leader (i.e., supervisor/manager) of the employees in conflict is the first place to check to assess whether the conflict is a symptom of a bigger problem or merely an isolated event. Things to look for include:

-What previous efforts have been made by the leader to address the conflict and with what results?

-Is the leader comfortable with conflict resolution?

-Is the leader role-modeling effective conflict resolution skills?

-What has the leader done to create a supportive environment within their group for effective conflict resolution?

-Is the leader consistent in how he/she addresses conflicts?

-Is the leader being held accountable by their supervisor in effectively addressing conflict resolution issues in their area?

-Are effective conflict resolution skills being practiced by the CEO and his/her senior management team?

The leadership factor is the most important predictor of how conflict will be handled within a given department and/or organization. If a supervisor/manager is ineffective in handling conflict, it is possible that their supervisor/manager may not be providing adequate coaching or guidance to them. If not, the problem has now expanded to the next level of leadership. Sometimes this can be traced all the way up to the CEO.

About the author: Greg Giesen is a professional speaker, management consultant, graduate professor and the author of, Ask Dr. Mac: Take the Journey to Authentic Leadership. Go to http://www.GregGiesenAssociates.com for more information.

Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/business-articles/addressing-organizational-conflict-188666.html



Mediation – Advantages To Mediation

about adr mediation centers become a mediator resources faqs news

Mediation is an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) that can avoid litigation. There many advantages and is highly recommended way to resolve a dispute before court proceedings. If a dispute goes to litigation it can often take a very long time and be quite costly. Mediation will save you time and money. It can be scheduled quickly in just a matter of days which means it will help avoid the hassle and costs of litigation.

Mediation is relatively cheap in comparison to litigation, it usually starts at around $500 per party. The mediation process will usually takes only a few hours to complete and it rarely lasts longer  than one to two days. Mediation can keep costs down to a minimum. The average cost for commercial mediation will usually be about 850 for each party, this is very low compared to the fact that you would generally pay a solicitor at least 250 per hour for their help.

 


Mediation

Transformative mediation an approach to conflict intervention

In a mediation process, the parties approach their case with the objective of seeking peaceful resolution. Mediation can take place through or with no attorneys in attendance, and can have diverse arrangements and approaches depending on the training and preference of the mediator and the inclinations of the parties.

Transformative mediation is premeditated to facilitate the parties attain i 00004000 nsights and reach deep resolution of underlying emotional issues, which makes available the key to resolving more on the surface issues. Transformative mediation is a comparatively new expansion in the mediation line of work, and requires a highly urbanized and difficult to get hold of skill-set by the mediator. It is practiced by relatively few mediators.

Facilitative is the mainly common type of mediation, and uses methods to aid a discussion between the parties with the objective to come to a declaration that is right for them, free of legal rights. Facilitative mediation tends to be need-based instead of rights-based mediation, and will more or less always have the parties jointly in the same room with the mediator. Facilitative mediation will time and again assist parties by having them work on communication and problem-solving skills during the mediation assembly.

About the author: Munish Rathee working for Ferris consulting, some of the client sites he is working on are Seattle divorce attorney, Cleveland Divorce Attorneys, and st. louis divorce attorney.

Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/law-articles/mediation-210374.html